That’s right: The healthy snacking tip we can take away from France is that they just don’t.
The average French child begins his or her day with a big bowl of milk accompanied by a few tartines: slices of fresh bread spread with butter or jam. French adults, meanwhile, swap out some (or all) of the milk for coffee, and many forego the tartines altogether, effectively fasting in lieu of breakfast.
Lunch is traditionally the longest and largest meal of the day: Adults working in offices usually get an hour (or two!), and it’s not uncommon to enjoy lunch with one’s colleagues at a restaurant—and even have a glass of wine. A French dinner is a smaller version of lunch: typically an appetizer (some form of salad, like grated carrots with vinaigrette, grated celery root with remoulade, or beetroot with herbs), a main, cheese, and a dessert—which, despite the fact that the French have access to all variety of delicious pastries, more often than not is a simple cup of yogurt.
And that’s it.
Between meals, France has no real snacking culture: reaching into the cupboards for a bag of chips, having a “just-in-case” granola bar in your purse, or even grabbing a green juice, smoothie, or milky latte during the day just doesn’t occur to the French. The only thing that does? A small, mid-afternoon morsel for children, dubbed le quatre-heures, or “the four o’clock.” Usually eaten sitting at the kitchen table when kids get home from school, this snack helps little bellies stay full between a noon lunch and an 8 p.m. dinner, but otherwise, you won’t ever catch anyone in France snacking.
This lack of grazing among the French seems to be a major contributing factor in their ability to stay slim, and it makes sense. After all, giving yourself fewer opportunities to eat during the day helps you cut back on calories, as evidenced by the popularity of intermittent fasting for weight loss. In fact, according to a 2013 study, those who cut out a meal ended up consuming 400 fewer calories each day, not feeling like they needed to eat more during the other meals they ate. So here comes the big question…
Should you stop snacking?
Many American experts agree that mindless, not intentional grazing is a habit Americans need to drop, including Nealy Fischer, author of Food You Want: For the Life You Crave.
“I actually don’t believe in snacking, personally,” she says, with the caveat that, like the French, she does believe that kids might occasionally need an extra something between meals. “I do think that there are moments where snacks are appropriate, especially after school,” she says.
On the other hand, Elise Museles, certified Eating Psychology and Nutrition Expert and podcast host of Once Upon a Food Story, thinks that both kids and adults can benefit from a mid-afternoon snack, especially if there is a big gap between lunch and dinner.
“I look at snacks as a bridge to keep your blood sugar stable,” she says. “Even if you eat the most balanced lunch, if you’re eating it at 12 or 1 o’clock and you’re waiting six or seven hours, I am a big believer in having something to keep your blood sugar stable between those hours. Having said that, if your eating patterns are more such that you’re eating in a shorter timeframe, and you go three or four hours between lunch and your dinner, then you don’t necessarily need a snack for that—unless your body’s telling you [that] you need it.”
It is this latter point that our experts highlight as the lynchpin in discovering whether or not snacking is a good idea for you: learning to identify your own hunger cues, a skill that many Americans have never really developed.
“My stance is and always will be to find an eating rhythm that truly works for you,” says Lindsey Kane, Director of Nutrition and RD for Sun Basket. She encourages people to listen to their own hunger cues to discover what feels best for their body. “Your body is biologically hardwired to give you a friendly nudge when it needs to be fed. Focus less on how many snacks am I ‘allowed’ to have, and instead, flip the script. Give yourself permission to eat as many snacks as you need to honor your hunger and fuel your body.”
This mindset flies in the face of popular fasting protocols, but our experts insist that while it’s certainly a good idea to wait until you’re hungry to eat, waiting until you’re starving could backfire.
“Depriving yourself of just one meal per day creates the toxic ‘all or nothing’ mentality,” says Kane. “When you do allow yourself to eat, you enter a crazy, hazy feeding frenzy—not exactly a state of mind where the most nourishing food choices are made.”
“When we don’t have a snack and we wait that long in between, our blood sugar crashes, and then we go into the next meal not being able to think clearly, and that can impact our choices,” she says.
Essentially, there is no one-size-fits-all approach: some people do well on two or three meals a day; others need three square meals and a snack or two–and that’s OK.
“Some people are adequately nourished and happy with three square meals per day, others prefer up to six smaller meals, and some like myself, have sorted out that we feel our best and are satisfied with three meals and one large afternoon snack,” says Monica Auslander Moreno, MS, RD, LD/N, nutrition consultant for RSP Nutrition. “As long as you are more or less meeting daily target intake levels for all the variety of food groups, methods, and timing of consumption don’t particularly hold much weight.”
What should you snack on?
If you decide that snacks are right for you, bear in mind that not all snacks are created equal. While the French quatre-heures tends to be quite sweet–baguette and dark chocolate, cookies, pound cake, or chouquettes, to name just a few–the ideal mid-afternoon snack should be healthful and nutrient-dense.
“The same simple set of guidelines for creating healthy meals applies to the snack category, too,” says Kane. “When you focus on the quality of your snacks, quantity becomes nearly irrelevant.”
“I think people should put as much thought into their snacks as they do their meals,” says Museles. “It should be balanced, they should try to get fresh fruits or vegetables in that, too, and it’s not just an afterthought.”
Kane also notes that ideally, snacks should be planned ahead of time, in order to set yourself up for success.
“For some reason, we tend to act surprised when hunger strikes at 3 p.m. But, more times than not, this hunger strikes like clockwork every day, so it shouldn’t really be a surprise,” she says. “Instead, take note of these hunger patterns. When you are aware of the patterns, you can anticipate them by packing a healthy snack so you are armed and at the ready whenever the hunger pang hits.”
The big healthy snacking tip: Take a mindful approach.
While these suggestions certainly deviate quite a bit from the standard French options, we would do well to embrace one element of the quatre heures: how and where it happens.
“Serve yourself a snack as you would serve a meal, on a plate or in a bowl,” says Kane. “Out-of-the-bag snacking makes it incredibly easy to subconsciously overdo it without even noticing.” Kane also encourages devoting conscious time to your snack.
“Try to step away from your other tasks for a few minutes so that you can give yourself the time and space you need to be fully present,” she says. “That way you can truly honor your hunger and respect your satiety and can recognize whenever you feel refueled and recharged to revisit the rest of your day with a reinvigorated burst of energy.”
Approaching snacking with this conscious, mindful philosophy will ensure that any food consumed between meals is purposeful and nourishing.